Congratulations to Zerto for winning Best of Show at #VMworld 2011

 

Zerto has a really compelling way of replicating data from your primary site to your disaster recovery site.

They use host-based replication by installing an appliance on each vSphere host. They don’t do snapshots; instead, they tap into the vSCSI I/O traffic on each host and replicate from that I/O stream, so it reduces the overhead on each host. You can configure a many to many replication scenario or a many to few replication scenario where you don’t have to have similar equipment on your DR site.

You can create protection groups based more on the application than the underlying hardware. For example, if you have a multitiered application that is made of several VMs running on multiple vSphere hosts and different storage LUNs or Arrays, you can identify them all and put them in a protection group and all of it will be replicated to your DR site. Here is a link to a video describing what they do in more detail.

I’m going to be testing Zerto and will post my findings.

VMware View 5: A Good Enough Sequel

Here comes View 5, in the rich tradition of other sequels that make it to the fifth iteration.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The common thing about all of these 5′s is they are all good enough popcorn movies. You’re not really expecting any great surprises and kind of know what you’re getting.

Now that View 5.0 is official, I can divulge that I was in the View 5 beta program. I really wasn’t blown away by new features or functionality. However, I understand that it makes sense to match vSphere 5 and SRM 5, which really are a full version updates with new useful features. There are some new things in View 5, but mostly it feels pretty familiar. Just open a soft drink to wash it down while you’re letting it install.

VMware knows View 5 just has to be good enough – not great. As long as VMware dominates the virtualized server infrastructure, the competition is going to have to offer an incredibly simple-to-use alternative. It is not unusual that companies put View and XenDesktop versus each other in proofs of concepts, but they often decide to go with View because it is good enough, and they already feel like they know the VMware stack.

View 5 shows VMware’s has grown into the company that seems to be taking the Microsoft approach when it comes to virtual desktops. There is no need to be too cutting-edge or inventive. They just need to focus on the features that are absolutely necessary to keep the series going. They have enough to focus on with all the challenges to get the cloud infrastructure and management tools ready.

I guess this is why Paul Maritz spent all of 15 seconds in the VMworld keynote announcing that View 5 is released. No need to get very excited about a product with a built-in audience that will use it because it is good enough.

Best of VMworld 2011

I’ll be at VMworld 2011 in Las Vegas this upcoming week. I’ve been asked to be a judge once again for the searchservervirtualization.com Best of VMworld this year.  I’ve spent a few hours so far reviewing the list of companies submitting for Best of VMworld. Many vendors this year are once again, raising the bar on functionality and features. I look forward to talking to them this week.

 

 

Vmworld 2010 Notes

The General Sessions have been pretty informative so far. Its been a bit funny how they have mentioned in the middle of other presentations about them buying companies as almost an afterthought.

Integrien and TriCipher both are good purchases and TriCipher is a really important one to get the SSO addressed to enable cloud adoption.The most striking thing to me though is how much VMware have shifted a bit on their approach to desktop virtualization. They sound very much like Citrix now as far as placing the end user experience as the primary success factor to desktop virtualization. I noticed on Twitter that I wasn’t the only one hearing it that way.