cialis meilleur prix cialis ohne rezept levitra generico acheter du viagra procurer du levitra tadalafil moins cher zyban prix sildenafil generico viagra ordonnance acheter kamagra 100mg cialis en ligne achat viagra en ligne commande levitra tadalafil precio procurer du cialis acheter accutane kamagra pas cher generische viagra generique cialis vendo viagra milano viagra prijs sildenafil costo comprar cialis em portugal propecia sans ordonnance cialis effet secondaire traitement impuissance viagra rezeptfrei comprar cialis generico levitra en ligne achat pharmacie achat kamagra levitra sans prescription prezzi levitra vente kamagra cialis en pharmacie cialis kopen achete levitra acquisto viagra generico viagra venta libre viagra kopen sildenafil generico levitra receta prozac sans ordonnance tadalafil venta cialis generico prezzo propecia prix acheter cialis internet levitra farmacia acheter cialis pas cher levitra 20 mg levitra kopen tadalafil bestellen cialis prix leivtra moins cher citrate de sildenafil achat levitra ordina viagra viagra 50 mg compro cialis pastilla levitra medicament impuissance aquisto cialis viagra farmacia cialis generique acheter compra levitra medicament cialis acheter zithromax posologia viagra comprar viagra generico tadalafil 10 mg viagra indien curare impotenza sildenafil venta libre compra viagra impuissance sexuelle sildenafil receta pilule levitra viagra dosaggio levitra donna viagra ohne rezept acquisto cialis generico cialis venta acheter cialis en belgique cialis effetti collaterali viagra 100 mg impotenza sessuale vente de cialis levitra generico cialis marche pas cialis inde vente cialis cialis pharmacie prix comprar vardenafil kamagra en france viagra svizzera cialis sur internet viagra quanto costa kamagra bestellen impuissance homme cialis vente en ligne vente levitra viagra preis vendo sildenafil cialis sur le net viagra ricetta medica cialis moins cher clomid prix cialis svizzera acheter cialis en ligne remede impuissance levitra ohne rezept acquistare viagra acheter cialis france levitra ordonnance vardenafil 10 mg pastilla cialis levitra italia receta viagra vendo viagra impotenza cure sildenafil generique vardenafil generika medicament viagra kamagra kopen sildenafil 50 mg viagra bestellen vardenafil generico viagra effet secondaire kamagra pharmacie cialis suisse vendo levitra comprare viagra

Archive for Microsoft

I get this question all of the time in one form or another, so I’m trying to determine hypervisor costs for a SMB as if I’m the owner looking to implement virtualization. This is an academic exercise, so pretend it’s your company and your money and you don’t have a particular vendor preference and you’re doing research online trying to determine apples to apples.

I usually don’t work the licensing side of the street, so I’m looking for feedback and correction if the costs are off the the mark. I’m using the vendor web sites and retail prices as if I were an SMB with no vendor connections.

Here’s the scenario:

  • It is a small business, one location
  • 50 users
  • 20 total virtual machines (once P2V’d) all running Windows Server 2003/2008
  • They already have 2 physical host servers. They have 2 sockets, quad core CPUs capable of running ESX(i), XenServer or Hyper-V
  • They have a new iSCSI storage array suitable for all of the VMs and hypervisors
  • They have appropriate network equipment for a redundant setup
  • They want a 3 year support agreement to go along with server hardware depreciation rate
  • They want one of the following platforms:  ESX or ESXi, XenServer, or Hyper-V
  • Direct licensing costs is the biggest decision factor – to keep the whole ROI argument simple

From these requirements, we should  have a really simple setup:

Two Hosts Connected to Shared Storage

Two Hosts Connected to Shared Storage

  • 2 host hypervisor systems connected to shared storage
  • Live Migration capability
  • High Availability if one of the host systems fail.

Hyper-V

I went to the Microsoft Licensing assistance site to help me determine what I would need:

It said I need the Datacenter Edition because I was running more than 4 VMs per host.

Product Edition Advisor from Microsoft's Site

Product Edition Advisor from Microsoft's Site

I worked my way through the tool and it recommended the Open Licensing with Software Assurance on the Server 2008 Datacenter version. The total was $8,094.

Not because the site really says so, but I think I need to add in the System Center with Virtual Machine Manager to be more on par with the other vendor’s management interfacesproducts.

I’m really not sure if I got all of the things included, but I bought Software Assurance with the Windows Server 2008 Datacenter, so I believe for Systems Center it will be $744 , plus I think I can use the Workgroup edition of Virtual Machine Manager for $505, plus I I think I’ll need CALs at $40 each of the 20 VMs for a total of $800. So for the management side of Hyper-V, I think the cost will be $2,049, plus whatever two more years will cost in maintenance.

I think I’ve met most of the requirements. Here is the link to the Hyper-V feature grid. But I couldn’t seem to select 3 years of support with their tools, so there will be more costs each year for maintenance. For one year I think the total is $10,143.

VMware ESX or ESXi

VMware has done  a good job with packaging their products for small businesses.  The Essentials Plus pack would be perfect at $4,905 except for some reason, it doesn’t include VMotion. So I guess we need to step up to the next level which is  VMware vSphere 4 Advanced with 3 years platinum support for $3,675 each, for a total of $7,350 for the servers.

But wait, it’s only for 1 CPU, so I’ll need to contact someone to see how much a second one is to add to my order.

Only 1 CPU, I'll have to add another one.

Only 1 CPU, I'll have to add another one.

To get VMotion and centralized management, I’ll need vCenter. They have vCenter Foundations for up to 3 hosts for $3,139 for a total of $10,489 for 3 years plus whatever a second physical CPU costs per physical host for the additional two years.

Citrix XenServer

Citrix has the technical product packaged pretty cleanly.

XenServer Enterprise has the technical features

XenServer Enterprise has the technical features

XenServer with XenMotion is free, but I need High Availability and support for 3 years, so I need XenServer Advanced, Citrix Essentials Advanced with 1 year preferred support for $8,500.

I still need 2 more years of support

I still need 2 more years of support

I still need 2 more years of support though. If it is linear, it should be $6,000 for 2 more years for a total of $14,500 to meet all of my requirements including 3 years of support.

Summary and To Do List

I don’t think I selected an unusual set of requirements in this as far as the hardware goes. I’ve seen plenty of dual CPU servers as the standard platform for virtualization projects. The 3 year support requirement didn’t seem to be out of line, but it seems to not be a frequent enough option for 2 of the 3 vendors to be in their online check out.

Microsoft – I need 2 more years of support costs. It wasn’t broken out where I could extrapolate it over 2 more years. I also would like for someone to validate that I have the right components and licenses for SCVMM.

VMware – I need to get the costs of adding the second socket CPU into the $7,530 server price

Citrix – I need to confirm that the support costs are $6,000 for two years

SQL server – I should note that both VMware vCenter and Microsoft’s Systems Center should be running with SQL server for production. Citrix XenServer does not require SQL server for XenCenter, so the cost of SQL Server can be deducted to the total for XenServer. For this exercise, I checked with CDW and SQL 2005 Standard was about $2,600.

  • I’ll have to contact each vendor’s licensing partner to get the cost of the missing pieces. Fortunately, I work for a company that is a partner to each vendor so it will be an inside job, but for the SMB owner, they’ll have to research further on the vendor’s site to locate a partner to talk over the specifics.
  • I invite comments from people that actually implement and license these platforms to steer me in the right direction if you see I’ve got the wrong edition of the platform.
  • I’m not interested in trying to sell why I should use one over the other as it appears that each vendor produces a platform that meet the requirements. If more components are required to produce a similar experience to the other two, then please let me know and I can add that in to the cost structure

It makes sense that the vendors would want to drive the larger organizations to partners to discuss pricing options. For the straightforward purchases like this scenario, it seems they might want to add just a few more options in their shopping carts for longer support warranties and more CPUs.

Once again, Citrix shows how to successfully play with Microsoft as a partner. They are taking the core functionality of App-V and building on it by delivering it with Citrix Receiver and Dazzle. I think having the applications delivered via Dazzle is a compelling idea.

What is still unclear is if Microsoft is going to make App-V’s licenses to gain a wider install base, but I expect that to happen soon as well.

As most of you know that read my blogs or twitter posts, I work with more than one virtualization vendor’s products. VMware has a huge library of virtual appliances, but it’s a bit of a hassle to convert them to other platforms.

Recently I’ve been working on upgrading our training and demo kits.  Part of our upgrade is to have the setups self documented by using a dedicated internal wiki on the kits themselves. I looked at several options including doing a fresh build from scratch.

Eventually, I found Turnkey Linux appliances. I like them because they aren’t already built appliances for one vendor;  instead, they are Ubuntu server .iso files with the software already installed and configured. That way you can install on pretty much any virtualization vendor that supports Ubuntu or Debian as a guest OS. Then it’s just a matter of installing the tools.

I installed a Mediawiki appliance on ESX  (New Virtual Machine>Ubuntu 32-bit, defaults on CPU and RAM and whatever size disk you want) and here are the post install steps to get the  VMware tools installed.

Refresh to the latest repositories.

  • apt-get update

Install the missing packages:

  • apt-get install gcc
  • apt-get install make
  • apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.24-23-generic (check your version of the kernel and match it)

Insert virtual CD ROM image by selecting  ”install vmware tools”  from the VM’s Edit  menu.
mount /dev/cdrom /media/cdrom
cp /media/cdrom/VMwareTools-xxxx.xxx…tar.gz  /tmp
cd /tmp
tar -zxvf VMwareTools-xxxxx.xxx….tar.gz
cd vmware-tools-distrib/
./vmware-install.pl

Select the defaults, you may have to tell it to use a newer version of gcc on one of the questions.

You should have the VMWare tools installed at this point.

Upgrade the system

  • apt-get upgrade

Start wikiing.

Whenever you are trying to come up with the best solution for physical to virtual (P2V) migrations, there are several things to consider. Depending on your downtime window, you sometimes have to get really creative. When the downtime window is very short, it also shortens the list of suitable methods to accomplish the P2V task. In that mix of options to have in your solution arsenal, Doubletake is a good one. I recently talked with Bob Roudebush from Doubletake about their new product suite.

Replication often happens at the hardware level with SAN mirroring but that can be costly or just not practical, depending on the project requirements. “Figuring out a way to replicate Exchange from one site to another is always a challenge. We do it with real time data replication with software. Because it’s software, some of the biggest benefits are the cost savings and no big costs with hardware.”

I asked about what host systems Doubletake works with currently and what is on their roadmap. “Our software works with virtual machines as well as physical. We’ve figured out with software what a SAN normally does. We have an edition of our product for ESX and one for Hyper-V, and XenServer is on the roadmap. The Linux version allows for block-level replication.”

Doubletake started out with a nice replication offering, but with this recent announcement, they’re seeking to become more. According to Bob, “The Company we’ve become over the years is much different than when we started. We aren’t just a point problem solver. We now have the ability to move data around in real time without the users knowing about it. For the first time, we are unveiling a workload product suite.”

The suite’s key capabilities include:

  • Workload Portability (Double-Take Move): Move workloads between any combination of physical and virtual hardware (P2P, P2V, V2P or V2V) within datacenters for hardware refreshes, or across locations for datacenter migrations and consolidations.
  • Workload Backup (Double-Take Backup): Continuously backup workloads and recover them on-demand to a new physical or virtual machine. Using CDP capabilities, recovery can also be done at the item level to any point in time.
  • Workload Availability (Double-Take Availability): Ensure the availability of critical IT workloads for disaster recovery and business continuity using real-time replication and failover that can protect individual applications, entire servers or virtualized workloads running on VMware ESX or Microsoft Hyper-V.
  • Workload Flexibility (Double-Take Flex): Easily manage any workload by booting it from iSCSI SANs, regardless of hardware.

I think Doubletake Flex is an interesting product. Bob said, “The idea is to make it easier to manage a workload to boot from network instead of local disks. Using the standard hardware you can boot to the iSCSI SAN. Blade servers are a good example. You may not have a lot of storage, and you can boot to an iSCSI LUN. We have a central console and assign MAC address to LUNs and it contacts to our management server to see where it needs to boot from and then it boots from the iSCSI SAN. ”

So, whenever you are faced with a ridiculous downtime window for your conversions, make sure to check out Doubletake’s solutions.

I’d like to thank Bob for taking his time to discuss the new Doubletake product suite.

Simon Crosby from Citrix makes the announcement on his blog.  XenServer is free. Additionally, more information will be coming out about the specifics of how deeply tied Citrix and Microsoft are with the XenServer and Hyper-V products.